What is an Author? by Michel Foucault

Michel Foucault’s essay “What is an Author?” (1969) rethinks the idea of the “author” in literature and how it functions in society. Building on and responding to Roland Barthes’ concept of the “death of the author,” Foucault shifts the discussion from personal identity to the function of the author in discourse. Rather than seeing the author as a real, creative individual behind a text, Foucault focuses on how the concept of the "author" is used to organize, classify, and control meaning within culture and knowledge systems.

Foucault begins by questioning why we give so much importance to the author. In earlier times, especially before the modern era, texts (especially religious or scientific ones) were often anonymous, and their truth did not depend on knowing who wrote them. But modern society developed a strong focus on the author's identity, often tying the meaning and value of a text to the person who created it. Foucault argues that this shift made the “author” a kind of cultural figure—someone whose name gives authority and value to a work. He introduces the idea of the “author-function”—the idea that “author” is not just a name but a role created by society. This function doesn’t apply to every kind of discourse; for example, we don’t ask who the “author” of a weather report is. But in literature, science, and philosophy, attaching an author’s name becomes a way to manage meaning, determine originality, and even apply rules like copyright or responsibility.

Foucault also notes that the “author” helps organize a group of texts—for instance, when we talk about “Shakespeare’s works,” we are grouping texts under a single name, even though the texts themselves are diverse and may not be completely unified. He challenges the idea of the author as a unique, creative genius and instead views authorship as a construct shaped by historical and institutional forces. Like Barthes, Foucault argues that we must look beyond the individual behind the text, but unlike Barthes, he is less interested in “killing” the author and more interested in analyzing how and why the author exists as a function within discourse.

In conclusion, Foucault’s “What is an Author?” invites us to see the author not as a real, individual creator, but as a socially constructed function that helps organize and control the production of knowledge and meaning. The “author-function” varies across time, cultures, and types of discourse, and it serves to classify, give authority, and regulate texts. Foucault doesn’t deny the existence of writers, but he urges us to shift our focus from the person who writes to the systems that define, value, and limit authorship. In doing so, he opens up new ways of thinking about literature, knowledge, and power.

WhatsApp Group Join Now

Telegram Group Join Now